Project website: https://www.fsd.uni-lj.si/raziskovalno_in_razvojno_delo/projekti/aktualni_projekti/2023101712552214/
Project type: Ciljni raziskovalni program CRP 2023
Code: V5-2335
Beginning: 01.10.2023
End: 31.03.2025
Funding: Slovene Research and Innovation Agency
Co-funding:
Ministry of Solidarity - Based Future
Collaborating organisations:
Social Protection Institute of the Republic of Slovenia
Institute of Criminology at the Faculty of Law Ljubljana
Coordinator: University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Social work
Leader: doc. dr. Vera Grebenc
Associates:
Summary:
The aim of the project was to develop an integrated model for the transformation of secure units in social care institutions in Slovenia into community-based forms. The research strategy was based on a combination of different research approaches and research methods that allowed us to collect, analyse and synthesise a variety of data. The research activities were designed to respond step by step to the main objectives, i.e. in a first step, the research focused on defining and clarifying the conceptual framework (e.g. rights, rights violations, recovery, safety, vulnerability, risk, needs, coercion, care). This was followed by a section in which the research captured the understanding of the legal framework that governs the area of secure units. As legislation normalises the use of coercion, it can also become a lever to reduce it. Through a comparative analysis, the coherence of internationally binding legal acts, Slovenian legislation and such regulations abroad was analysed. The main sub-themes in this section were the conditions for coercive measures, the role of guardianship in admission and discharge, and the accessibility of mental health representatives in practise, as users in secure units have significantly limited contractual power. The research also included an analysis of users' needs, focusing on users who are accommodated in a secure unit at the time of the survey and those on the waiting list for admission to a secure unit. At the same time, we analysed the security units as a form of work and assessed the extent to which this form of working with users can successfully respond to their needs and how the form should be changed to better meet the actual needs of users. The analysis was complemented by a comparative analysis of good practises from abroad, especially those carried out in the community, without coercion and detention and based on respect for human rights. The analysis of the functioning of secure units also included an analysis of the working methods used by professionals in secure units in Slovenia. The results made it possible to design alternative forms of action in the field of care for adults and children with disabilities, including safeguarding, and to formulate a proposal for the transformation of secure unis into community-based forms based on the needs of users, human rights and the results of the analysis of best practises.
Publications: